[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f021001182337o274c8ed3q8ce60581094bc2b9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:37:05 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
andrew.c.morrow@...il.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] add MAP_UNLOCKED mmap flag
Hi Gleb,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com> wrote:
> The thread took a direction of bashing mlockall(). This is especially
> strange since proposed patch actually makes mlockall() more fine
> grained and thus more useful.
No, the thread took a direction of you not being able to properly
explain why we want MMAP_UNLOCKED in the kernel. It seems useless for
real-time and I've yet to figure out why you need _mlockall()_ if it's
a performance thing.
It would be probably useful if you could point us to the application
source code that actually wants this feature.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists