[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263981472.4283.843.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:57:52 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ananth@...ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
utrace-devel <utrace-devel@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Maneesh Soni <maneesh@...ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP)
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 11:43 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> 1. Write a trace entry into shared memory, trap into the kernel on overflow.
> 2. Trap if a condition is satisfied (fast watchpoint implementation).
So now you want to consume more of a process' address space to store
trace data as well? Not to mention that that process could wreck the
trace data rendering it utterly unreliable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists