[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B56E66C.50004@monstr.eu>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:18:04 +0100
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, michal.simek@...alogix.com,
arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Generic DMA - BUG_ON
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:53:50AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
>> and ops is NULL, then this code will oops; you will get a full register
>> dump and backtrace. You can use this information along with markup_oops.pl
>> to find out where the problem is.
>
> You can't rely on the oops if the code runs in process context. The
> process may have address 0 mapped which would result in a security hole.
> We had two of these bugs last year.
That's the same problem which I had some days ago and Microblaze misses
valuable backtrace (because we don't have FP or constant frame size).
>
> But I don't see any point in checking for dma_ops != NULL too. Any
> developer would mention such a bug long before init is started.
I agree that checking adds extra cycles to every dma-api call.
I like as wrote Russel to check if ops exists or not.
Let's look at code which is there.
dma_map_single_attrs - calls ops->map_page without any checking
The same for dma_map_sg_attrs, dma_map_page
The rest of functions is ok. If any checking will be there, I don't have
any problem with it.
Michal
>
> Joerg
>
>
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists