linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kvm: only allow one gsi per fd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:52:00 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: only allow one gsi per fd

On 01/20/2010 01:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:40:13PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>    
>> On 01/13/2010 06:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>      
>>> Looks like repeatedly binding same fd to multiple gsi's with irqfd can
>>> use up a ton of kernel memory for irqfd structures.
>>>
>>> A simple fix is to allow each fd to only trigger one gsi: triggering a
>>> srorm of interrupts in guest is likely useless anyway, and we can do it
>>> by binding a single gsi to many interrupts if we really want to.
>>>
>>>        
>> Applied and queued, thanks.
>>      
> I'm guessing we need this for 2.6.32 stable and 2.6.33 as well?
>    

That's what 'queued' means.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/