lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B56F588.2060109@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:22:32 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	ananth@...ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	utrace-devel <utrace-devel@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
	Maneesh Soni <maneesh@...ibm.com>,
	Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP)

On 01/20/2010 11:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 11:43 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>    
>> 1. Write a trace entry into shared memory, trap into the kernel on overflow.
>> 2. Trap if a condition is satisfied (fast watchpoint implementation).
>>      
> So now you want to consume more of a process' address space to store
> trace data as well?

Yes.  I know I'm bad.

> Not to mention that that process could wreck the
> trace data rendering it utterly unreliable.
>    

It could, but it also might not.  Are we going to deny high performance 
tracing to users just because it doesn't work in all cases?

Note this applies to any kind of monitoring or debugging technology.  A 
process can be influenced by the debugger and render any debug info you 
get out of it unreliable.  One non-timing example is a process using a 
checksum of its text as an input to some algorithm.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ