[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100120130129.GH16096@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:01:29 -0500
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
utrace-devel@...hat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: add utrace tree
Hi -
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 07:28:34AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> [...]
> > On the other hand, having ptrace/utrace in the -next tree will give it a
> > lot more testing, while any outstanding technical issues are being addressed.
>
> Including experimental code that is RFC and which is not certain to go
> upstream is certainly not the purpose of linux-next though.
> [...]
Ingo, you are mistaken. The utrace core and utrace/ptrace code were
submitted and reviewed together on lkml, and are not considered
experimental.
I know the names may be confusing, but it is unnecessary to bring up
uprobes and other RFC/experimental items. None of these are included
in the branch I pointed sfr to.
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists