linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 20/40] arm,kgdb: Add hook to catch an oops with debugger

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100120160319.GC27507@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:03:19 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/40] arm,kgdb: Add hook to catch an oops with debugger

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 08:30:04AM -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> That being said, you patch works for the purpose of catching the
> exception and returning with or without the addition of an earlier
> return before bust_spinlocks() which I had proposed.

So does that mean I can have an acked-by for the patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/