[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B56641E.1030803@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:02:06 -0800
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
CC: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cleanup switches with cases that can be merged
Roel Kluin wrote:
> I did a search for switch statements with cases that can be merged, but maybe
> some were not intended?
> ---------------->8------------------------------------------8<-----------------
> In these cases the same code was executed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/octeon/octeon-feature.h | 8 ++------
> arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c | 3 ---
> arch/mips/math-emu/ieee754dp.c | 1 -
> arch/mips/math-emu/ieee754sp.c | 1 -
> arch/mips/pci/pci-octeon.c | 6 ++----
> arch/mips/powertv/asic/asic_devices.c | 4 ----
> arch/mips/sgi-ip32/ip32-irq.c | 9 +--------
> 7 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
This patch should be split up.
Octeon, PowerTV, and IP32 are all different architectures. They should
be in their own patches.
The two math-emu parts could probably go together.
cpu-probe seems like its own thing.
This brings us to the larger question: This is just code churn. Is it
even worthwhile?
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists