linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sky2: Fix WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:902 check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100120123033.0746b11e@nehalam>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:30:33 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
Cc:	"Jarek Poplawski" <jarkao2@...il.com>,
	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Michael Breuer" <mbreuer@...jas.com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"flyboy@...il.com" <flyboy@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Don Fry" <pcnet32@...izon.net>,
	"Francois Romieu" <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	"Matthew Carlson" <mcarlson@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: Fix WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:902 check_sync

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:11:52 -0800
"Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com> wrote:

> 
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:03 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:41:03 +0000
> > Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > Seems like an underlying bug in the DMA api. Maybe it just can't
> > > > handle operations on partial mapping.
> > > > 
> > > > Other drivers with same problem:
> > > >   bnx2, cassini, pcnet32, r8169, rrunner, skge, sungem, tg3, 
> > > 
> > > It seems using the same length (even without pci_unmap_len()) is
> > > crucial here, but I hope maintainers (added to CC) will take care.
> > > 
> 
> I'm still unsure how to do dma_sync properly in bnx2.  In the current
> code, we always dma_sync_for_cpu a small portion of the SKB because the
> rx descriptor is at the beginning of the SKB.  We get the packet length,
> for example, from the rx descriptor.
> 
> If it's a big packet, we'll simply unmap the entire SKB buffer (with the
> beginning portion already dma_sync'ed).  If the packet is smaller than
> what we dma_sync'ed, we'll just copy the data to a new SKB.  We'll then
> dma_sync_for_device the portion of the original buffer and recycle the
> whole buffer back to the device for new packets.
> 
> So, is it correct to just change the dma_sync length to the full length
> of the buffer?  It doesn't sound right to me.

It looks like the size passed to sync_single has to match size of original
mapping.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/