linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] sata_via: Delay on vt6420 when starting ATAPI DMA write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B56A8C9.2000807@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:55:05 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Bart Hartgers <bart.hartgers@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, juergen.metzdorf@...elev-dsl.de,
	markpschool@...mail.com, sporadic.crash@...il.com, apopov@...ma.bg,
	david@...mber.co.za, jay4mail@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] sata_via: Delay on vt6420 when starting ATAPI DMA
 	write

Hello,

On 01/20/2010 03:44 PM, Bart Hartgers wrote:
> Yes, you're right. I'll drop the printk_once and send another patch
> for inclusion. However, for testing I found it very useful to make
> sure that I got the right module loaded. So I figured it could be
> helpful for the interpretation of success/failure reports.

Oh yeah, for testing, having it there is a good idea.

> Assuming that this patch works for other people as well, what is
> prefered: resending both patches or just to make a new #2/2 (the
> vt6420 one)?

I think just re-doing the second patch should be enough.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/