[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100120175959.59daa481.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:59:59 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
utrace-devel@...hat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: add utrace tree
Hi Frank,
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:28:34 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> Including experimental code that is RFC and which is not certain to go
> upstream is certainly not the purpose of linux-next though.
Ingo is correct in what he says here. See the boilerplate:
" * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch)."
I will remove this tree from linux-next tomorrow and wait until it is
more ready for mainline inclusion.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists