[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001211121500.13529@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:22:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: vladislav.yasevich@...com, sri@...ibm.com,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:10:10 -0500
>
> >
> >
> > Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> >>
> >> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
> >> expression. Drop one initialization.
> >>
> >> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
> >> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >>
> >> // <smpl>
> >> @forall@
> >> idexpression *x;
> >> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
> >> @@
> >>
> >> x = f(...)
> >> ... when != x
> >> (
> >> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
> >> |
> >> * x = f(...)
> >> )
> >> // </smpl>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> >
> > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
>
> Julia, just like patch #3 this one had the missing final
> line of the patch corrupting it, so you'll need to resubmit.
I have generated and sent it again, but this time I don't see the problem.
If there is still a problem, perhaps you could send me back the patch you
received?
thanks,
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists