[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1264070785.4283.1152.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:46:25 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: improve x86 event scheduling (v5)
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 11:43 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 10:58 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> void hw_perf_enable(void)
> >> {
> >
> >
> >> + cpuc->n_added = 0;
> >> + perf_events_lapic_init();
> >
> > Just wondering, why do we need that lapic_init() there?
> >
> I think I picked it up from x86_pmu_enable(). I don't think
> you necessarily need it here. Not clear to me why it was
> in x86_pmu_enable() to begin with.
Right, wondering about the same ;-)
> I will post a new version of the patch which fixes some bugs and
> also implements true fast path (reuse of previous assignment). It turned
> out, things were a bit more complicated than what I had in v5.
Could you post a diff against your previous version, I just picked up
-v5 and tidied a few things up and send it mingo wards (although it
appears he hasn't picked it up yet).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists