linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] oom-kill: add lowmem usage aware oom kill handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1264087124.1818.15.camel@barrios-desktop>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:18:44 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	rientjes@...gle.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom-kill: add lowmem usage aware oom kill handling

Hi, Kame. 

On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 14:59 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> A patch for avoiding oom-serial-killer at lowmem shortage.
> Patch is onto mmotm-2010/01/15 (depends on mm-count-lowmem-rss.patch)
> Tested on x86-64/SMP + debug module(to allocated lowmem), works well.
> 
> ==
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> 
> One cause of OOM-Killer is memory shortage in lower zones.
> (If memory is enough, lowmem_reserve_ratio works well. but..)
> 
> In lowmem-shortage oom-kill, oom-killer choses a vicitim process
> on their vm size. But this kills a process which has lowmem memory
> only if it's lucky. At last, there will be an oom-serial-killer.
> 
> Now, we have per-mm lowmem usage counter. We can make use of it
> to select a good? victim.
> 
> This patch does
>   - add CONSTRAINT_LOWMEM to oom's constraint type.
>   - pass constraint to __badness()
>   - change calculation based on constraint. If CONSTRAINT_LOWMEM,
>     use low_rss instead of vmsize.

As far as low memory, it would be better to consider lowmem counter.
But as you know, {vmsize VS rss} is debatable topic.
Maybe someone doesn't like this idea. 

So don't we need any test result at least?
If we don't have this patch, it happens several innocent process
killing. but we can't prevent it by this patch. 

Sorry for bothering you.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/