[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <979dd0561001201906j5acedd8ay42d7bc68beefbb9e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:06:03 +0800
From: anfei zhou <anfei.zhou@...il.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: cache alias in mmap + write
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org> wrote:
> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> 2. Add some commnet. almost developer only have x86 machine. so, arm
>> specific trick need additional explicit explanation. otherwise anybody
>> might break this code in the future.
>
> That's Documentation/cachetlb.txt.
>
> What's being discussed here is not ARM-specific, although it appears
> maintainers of different architecture (ARM and MIPS for a start) may
> have different ideas about what they are guaranteeing to userspace.
> It sounds like MIPS expects userspace to use msync() sometimes (even
> though Linux msync(MS_INVALIDATE) is quite broken), and ARM expects to
> to keep mappings coherent automatically (which is sometimes slower
> than necessary, but usually very helpful).
>
>> 3. Resend the patch. original mail isn't good patch format. please
>> consider to reduce akpm suffer.
>
> This type of change in generic code would need review from a number of
> architecture maintainers, I'd expect.
>
So should I broadcast this mail in order to get their attentions,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org?
Thanks!
> -- Jamie
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists