linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] libata-sff: remove CONFIG_NO_ATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B58F5F6.9090001@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:48:54 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Christoph Egger <siccegge@...d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	jgarzik@...ox.com, Reinhard.Tartler@...ormatik.uni-erlangen.de,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] libata-sff: remove CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY

(cc'ing David Howells, who BTW is on vacation till Feb) Hi!

On 01/21/2010 09:04 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:14:02 +0900
> Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY isn't used by anyone.  Drop it.
>>
>> Reported-by: Christoph Egger <siccegge@...d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> 
> Not unless this is cleared with the FRV maintainers who were using
> it and I believe may still need it.
> 
> Mr Howells ?

David, the patch in question is,

  http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/20/396

Does FRV still need it?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/