linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/srat_64.c: make node_possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B597A7B.4050906@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:14:19 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/srat_64.c: make node_possible_map include hotpluggable
 node

On 01/22/2010 12:43 AM, Haicheng Li wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> I have to say I agree with David Rientjes that we need the minimal patch
>> for upstream and stable.  If you need the additional bitmask in the
>> future it should be added later.
>>
>> Haicheng, would you be willing to prepare a minimal patch so we can
>> close the issue in the release trees as quickly as possible?
> 
> Peter,
> 
> Okay, let's close it. then please take the patch pasted below, which is
> the one without additional bitmask added.
> 

As David asked, OK to add your Tested-by: line?

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/