[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100122064528.0223d708@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 06:45:28 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org,
awalls@...ix.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, avi@...hat.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, andi@...stfloor.org,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 38/40] cifs: use workqueue instead of slow-work
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:14:37 +0900
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Workqueue can now handle high concurrency. Use system_single_wq
> instead of slow-work.
>
> * Updated is_valid_oplock_break() to not call cifs_oplock_break_put()
> as advised by Steve French. It might cause deadlock. Instead,
> reference is increased after queueing succeeded and
> cifs_oplock_break() briefly grabs GlobalSMBSeslock before putting
> the cfile to make sure it doesn't put before the matching get is
> finished.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>
> ---
> Another approach would be to put from a different work which would be
> cleaner but need more code. How does this one look to you?
>
> Thanks.
>
> fs/cifs/Kconfig | 1 -
> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 6 +-----
> fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 8 +++++---
> fs/cifs/dir.c | 2 +-
> fs/cifs/file.c | 30 +++++++++++++-----------------
> fs/cifs/misc.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> Index: work/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> +++ work/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> @@ -1038,15 +1038,10 @@ init_cifs(void)
> if (rc)
> goto out_unregister_key_type;
> #endif
> - rc = slow_work_register_user(THIS_MODULE);
> - if (rc)
> - goto out_unregister_resolver_key;
>
> return 0;
>
> - out_unregister_resolver_key:
> #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL
> - unregister_key_type(&key_type_dns_resolver);
> out_unregister_key_type:
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_UPCALL
> @@ -1069,6 +1064,7 @@ static void __exit
> exit_cifs(void)
> {
> cFYI(DBG2, ("exit_cifs"));
> + flush_workqueue(system_single_wq);
> cifs_proc_clean();
> #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL
> cifs_dfs_release_automount_timer();
> Index: work/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ work/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
> */
> #include <linux/in.h>
> #include <linux/in6.h>
> -#include <linux/slow-work.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include "cifs_fs_sb.h"
> #include "cifsacl.h"
> /*
> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ struct cifsFileInfo {
> atomic_t count; /* reference count */
> struct mutex fh_mutex; /* prevents reopen race after dead ses*/
> struct cifs_search_info srch_inf;
> - struct slow_work oplock_break; /* slow_work job for oplock breaks */
> + struct work_struct oplock_break; /* work for oplock breaks */
> };
>
> /* Take a reference on the file private data */
> @@ -723,4 +723,6 @@ GLOBAL_EXTERN unsigned int cifs_min_rcv;
> GLOBAL_EXTERN unsigned int cifs_min_small; /* min size of small buf pool */
> GLOBAL_EXTERN unsigned int cifs_max_pending; /* MAX requests at once to server*/
>
> -extern const struct slow_work_ops cifs_oplock_break_ops;
> +void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work);
> +void cifs_oplock_break_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile);
> +void cifs_oplock_break_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile);
> Index: work/fs/cifs/dir.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/fs/cifs/dir.c
> +++ work/fs/cifs/dir.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ cifs_new_fileinfo(struct inode *newinode
> mutex_init(&pCifsFile->lock_mutex);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pCifsFile->llist);
> atomic_set(&pCifsFile->count, 1);
> - slow_work_init(&pCifsFile->oplock_break, &cifs_oplock_break_ops);
> + INIT_WORK(&pCifsFile->oplock_break, cifs_oplock_break);
>
> write_lock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> list_add(&pCifsFile->tlist, &cifs_sb->tcon->openFileList);
> Index: work/fs/cifs/file.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ work/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -2276,8 +2276,7 @@ out:
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static void
> -cifs_oplock_break(struct slow_work *work)
> +void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct cifsFileInfo *cfile = container_of(work, struct cifsFileInfo,
> oplock_break);
> @@ -2316,33 +2315,30 @@ cifs_oplock_break(struct slow_work *work
> LOCKING_ANDX_OPLOCK_RELEASE, false);
> cFYI(1, ("Oplock release rc = %d", rc));
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * We might have kicked in before is_valid_oplock_break()
> + * finished grabbing reference for us. Make sure it's done by
> + * waiting for GlobalSMSSeslock.
> + */
> + write_lock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> + write_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> +
^^^^
When I backported this before, I put this at the beginning of the
function, not just before the put. I think that this is actually ok
though. We may end up running the function without holding the
references, but the objects we're concerned about can't be freed until
is_valid_oplock_break drops the spinlock.
> + cifs_oplock_break_put(cfile);
> }
>
> -static int
> -cifs_oplock_break_get(struct slow_work *work)
> +void cifs_oplock_break_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile)
> {
> - struct cifsFileInfo *cfile = container_of(work, struct cifsFileInfo,
> - oplock_break);
> mntget(cfile->mnt);
> cifsFileInfo_get(cfile);
> - return 0;
> }
>
> -static void
> -cifs_oplock_break_put(struct slow_work *work)
> +void cifs_oplock_break_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile)
> {
> - struct cifsFileInfo *cfile = container_of(work, struct cifsFileInfo,
> - oplock_break);
> mntput(cfile->mnt);
> cifsFileInfo_put(cfile);
> }
>
> -const struct slow_work_ops cifs_oplock_break_ops = {
> - .get_ref = cifs_oplock_break_get,
> - .put_ref = cifs_oplock_break_put,
> - .execute = cifs_oplock_break,
> -};
> -
> const struct address_space_operations cifs_addr_ops = {
> .readpage = cifs_readpage,
> .readpages = cifs_readpages,
> Index: work/fs/cifs/misc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/fs/cifs/misc.c
> +++ work/fs/cifs/misc.c
> @@ -499,7 +499,6 @@ is_valid_oplock_break(struct smb_hdr *bu
> struct cifsTconInfo *tcon;
> struct cifsInodeInfo *pCifsInode;
> struct cifsFileInfo *netfile;
> - int rc;
>
> cFYI(1, ("Checking for oplock break or dnotify response"));
> if ((pSMB->hdr.Command == SMB_COM_NT_TRANSACT) &&
> @@ -584,13 +583,18 @@ is_valid_oplock_break(struct smb_hdr *bu
> pCifsInode->clientCanCacheAll = false;
> if (pSMB->OplockLevel == 0)
> pCifsInode->clientCanCacheRead = false;
> - rc = slow_work_enqueue(&netfile->oplock_break);
> - if (rc) {
> - cERROR(1, ("failed to enqueue oplock "
> - "break: %d\n", rc));
> - } else {
> - netfile->oplock_break_cancelled = false;
> - }
> +
> + /*
> + * cifs_oplock_break_put() can't be called
> + * from here. Get reference after queueing
> + * succeeded. cifs_oplock_break() will
> + * synchronize using GlobalSMSSeslock.
> + */
> + if (queue_work(system_single_wq,
> + &netfile->oplock_break))
> + cifs_oplock_break_get(netfile);
> + netfile->oplock_break_cancelled = false;
> +
I think we want to move the setting of netfile->oplock_break_cancelled
inside of the if above it.
If the work is already queued, I don't think we want to set the flag to
false. Doing so might be problematic if we somehow end up processing
this oplock break after a previous oplock break/reconnect/reopen
sequence, but while the initial oplock break is still running.
> read_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> read_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
> return true;
> Index: work/fs/cifs/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/fs/cifs/Kconfig
> +++ work/fs/cifs/Kconfig
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ config CIFS
> tristate "CIFS support (advanced network filesystem, SMBFS successor)"
> depends on INET
> select NLS
> - select SLOW_WORK
> help
> This is the client VFS module for the Common Internet File System
> (CIFS) protocol which is the successor to the Server Message Block
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists