linux-kernel - Re: Current status of UML development?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100122162356.GA4771@hack>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:23:56 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Dimitry Golubovsky <golubovsky@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Current status of UML development?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 03:27:58PM -0500, Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am learning/experimenting with UML internals, and am curious what is
>the current status of its development? Has UML become stable enough so
>it does not need any improvement (at least for i386), or has its
>development just ceased in favor of other virtualization techniques?
>

Of course not.

>Also I am trying to find recent papers covering modern UML's principles of
>functioning (especially the skas0 mode when /proc/mm is not
>available), but most of the papers that Google returns date back to
>2001 - 2003, and often state that "each UML process gets its own host
>process" that does not seem correct these days.
>

Yeah, I think we still don't have a fully support for that,
welcome to work on it.

Thanks.


-- 
Live like a child, think like the god.
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/