linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/10] perf_event: Optimize the constraint searching bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:28:36 +0100
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	fweisbec@...il.com, paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	davem@...emloft.net, robert.richter@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] perf_event: Optimize the constraint searching bits

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 17:08 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
>> > Instead of copying bitmasks around, pass pointers to the constraint structure.
>> >
>> The reason I changed that is because of the AMD situation where constraints
>> are dynamically generated. So we need to get some storage from somwhere.
>> See my AMD NB patch,
>
> Can't we still do that by embedding 4 event_constraint structures in
> struct amd_nb and rewriting those as we need?
>
We sure could do that too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/