[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1264178909.4283.1543.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:48:29 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] perf lock: New subcommand "perf lock", for
analyzing lock statistics
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 11:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:39:01PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > Adding new subcommand "perf lock" to perf.
> >
>
> looks like a really intresting patch! Does this patch mean that we can
> potentially remove CONFIG_LOCK_STAT, now that the functionality is
> available via 'perf'? Another desire for me has been to able to run
> lockstat on production box. This has not been possible before without
> incurring the performance penalty of lockdep. however, with 'perf' tools
> ability to be turned on an off, perhaps there is (or we can build) a
> mode for lockdep that is lower overhead for this usecase?
boot with: prove_locking=0
This patch still needs all the hooks and bits from lockdep, no way you
want all that in a prodction kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists