linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 02/10] ftrace: Ensure tracing has really stopped before leaving unregister_ftrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1264125108.31321.304.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:51:48 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/10] ftrace: Ensure tracing has really stopped
 before leaving unregister_ftrace_graph

On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 02:16 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> When we run under dynamic tracing, we know that after calling
> unregister_ftrace_graph(), tracing has really stopped because of
> the hot patching and use of stop_machine().

This is incorrect. Even after unregister_ftrace_graph() with
stop_machine(), we still have no guarantee that a call back is not being
called. This is the reason I use sub tracing instead of NULLs. The call
to the trace function could have been loaded in a register and then
preempted. Even after stop_machine() that trace function can be called.
This is also the reason that I never let modules add hooks to the
function tracer (although I can easily make a wrapper to do so).

> 
> But in static tracing case, we only set stub callbacks. This is
> not sufficient on archs that have weak memory ordering to assume
> the older callbacks won't be called right after we leave
> unregister_ftrace_graph().
> 
> Insert a read/write memory barrier in the end of
> unregister_ftrace_graph() so that the code that follow can safely
> assume tracing has really stopped. This can avoid its older tracing
> callbacks to perform checks about various states like ensuring
> needed buffers have been allocated, etc...

There's no guarantee, even with a smp_mb() that a trace function will
not be called after being unregistered.

-- Steve



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/