| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <201001222219.15958.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:19:15 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [Update][PATCH] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume
On Friday 22 January 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:42 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > > > Probably we have multiple option. but I don't think GFP_NOIO is good
> > > > > option. It assume the system have lots non-dirty cache memory and it isn't
> > > > > guranteed.
> > > >
> > > > Basically nothing is guaranteed in this case. However, does it actually make
> > > > things _worse_?
> > >
> > > Hmm..
> > > Do you mean we don't need to prevent accidental suspend failure?
> > > Perhaps, I did misunderstand your intention. If you think your patch solve
> > > this this issue, I still disagree. but If you think your patch mitigate
> > > the pain of this issue, I agree it. I don't have any reason to oppose your
> > > first patch.
> >
> > One question. Have anyone tested Rafael's $subject patch?
> > Please post test result. if the issue disapper by the patch, we can
> > suppose the slowness is caused by i/o layer.
>
> I did.
>
> As far as I could see, patch does solve the problem I described.
>
> Does it affect speed of suspend? I can't say for sure. It seems to be
> the same.
Thanks for testing.
Below is a slightly different version of that patch. Can you please give it a
try?
Rafael
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume
There are quite a few GFP_KERNEL memory allocations made during
suspend/hibernation and resume that may cause the system to hang,
because the I/O operations they depend on cannot be completed due to
the underlying devices being suspended.
Mitigate this problem by clearing the __GFP_IO and __GFP_FS bits in
gfp_allowed_mask before suspend/hibernation and restoring the
original values of these bits in gfp_allowed_mask durig the
subsequent resume.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Reported-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
---
kernel/power/hibernate.c | 6 ++++++
kernel/power/power.h | 3 +++
kernel/power/suspend.c | 2 ++
mm/Makefile | 1 +
mm/pm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/power/hibernate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/hibernate.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/hibernate.c
@@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ int hibernation_snapshot(int platform_mo
goto Close;
suspend_console();
+ mm_force_noio_allocations();
error = dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_FREEZE);
if (error)
goto Recover_platform;
@@ -351,6 +352,7 @@ int hibernation_snapshot(int platform_mo
dpm_resume_end(in_suspend ?
(error ? PMSG_RECOVER : PMSG_THAW) : PMSG_RESTORE);
+ mm_allow_io_allocations();
resume_console();
Close:
platform_end(platform_mode);
@@ -448,11 +450,13 @@ int hibernation_restore(int platform_mod
pm_prepare_console();
suspend_console();
+ mm_force_noio_allocations();
error = dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_QUIESCE);
if (!error) {
error = resume_target_kernel(platform_mode);
dpm_resume_end(PMSG_RECOVER);
}
+ mm_allow_io_allocations();
resume_console();
pm_restore_console();
return error;
@@ -481,6 +485,7 @@ int hibernation_platform_enter(void)
entering_platform_hibernation = true;
suspend_console();
+ mm_force_noio_allocations();
error = dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_HIBERNATE);
if (error) {
if (hibernation_ops->recover)
@@ -518,6 +523,7 @@ int hibernation_platform_enter(void)
Resume_devices:
entering_platform_hibernation = false;
dpm_resume_end(PMSG_RESTORE);
+ mm_allow_io_allocations();
resume_console();
Close:
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/power/power.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/power.h
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/power.h
@@ -187,6 +187,9 @@ static inline void suspend_test_finish(c
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
/* kernel/power/main.c */
extern int pm_notifier_call_chain(unsigned long val);
+/* mm/pm.c */
+extern void mm_force_noio_allocations(void);
+extern void mm_allow_io_allocations(void);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/power/suspend.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/suspend.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/suspend.c
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ int suspend_devices_and_enter(suspend_st
goto Close;
}
suspend_console();
+ mm_force_noio_allocations();
suspend_test_start();
error = dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_SUSPEND);
if (error) {
@@ -224,6 +225,7 @@ int suspend_devices_and_enter(suspend_st
suspend_test_start();
dpm_resume_end(PMSG_RESUME);
suspend_test_finish("resume devices");
+ mm_allow_io_allocations();
resume_console();
Close:
if (suspend_ops->end)
Index: linux-2.6/mm/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/Makefile
+++ linux-2.6/mm/Makefile
@@ -40,3 +40,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE) += memory-f
obj-$(CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT) += hwpoison-inject.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK) += kmemleak.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST) += kmemleak-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += pm.o
Index: linux-2.6/mm/pm.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ linux-2.6/mm/pm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+#include <linux/gfp.h>
+
+static gfp_t saved_gfp_allowed_mask;
+
+#define GFP_IOFS (__GFP_IO | __GFP_FS)
+
+/**
+ * mm_force_noio_allocations - Modify gfp_allowed_mask to disable IO allocations
+ *
+ * Change gfp_allowed_mask by unsetting __GFP_IO and __GFP_FS in it and save the
+ * old value.
+ */
+void mm_force_noio_allocations(void)
+{
+ saved_gfp_allowed_mask = gfp_allowed_mask;
+ gfp_allowed_mask &= ~GFP_IOFS;
+}
+
+/**
+ * mm_allow_io_allocations - Modify gfp_allowed_mask to allow IO allocations
+ *
+ * If the saved value of gfp_allowed_mask has __GFP_IO set, modify the current
+ * gfp_allowed_mask by setting this bit and anlogously for __GFP_FS.
+ */
+void mm_allow_io_allocations(void)
+{
+ gfp_allowed_mask |= saved_gfp_allowed_mask & GFP_IOFS;
+}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists