[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04391A4E90BB2149B010D22452FA16875F0348DF@HQ-EXCH-6.corp.brocade.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:59:35 -0800
From: Jing Huang <huangj@...cade.COM>
To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Adapter Linux Open SRC Team
<adapter_linux_open_src_team@...cade.COM>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] bfa: comparison with wrong msgtag in bfa_pport_isr()
> Was this maybe intended? otherwise in case BFI_PPORT_I2H_ENABLE_RSP:
> the same code is executed. Please review.
Making this change alone will break compilation since bfa_pport_disable_rsp_s is not defined. To fix this, we should also replace it with bfa_pport_generic_rsp_s in bfi_pport_i2h_msg_u.
But please keep this as it is for now since I am working on resubmitting 2.1.2.1 patch, and there are a lot of changes in this area.
Thanks
Jing
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c
> index aef648b..f00d07b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c
> @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ bfa_pport_isr(struct bfa_s *bfa, struct bfi_msg_s
> *msg)
> break;
>
> case BFI_PPORT_I2H_DISABLE_RSP:
> - if (pport->msgtag == i2hmsg.enable_rsp->msgtag)
> + if (pport->msgtag == i2hmsg.disable_rsp->msgtag)
> bfa_sm_send_event(pport, BFA_PPORT_SM_FWRSP);
> break;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists