linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 03/10] ftrace: Drop the ftrace_profile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1264129978.31321.333.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:12:58 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/10] ftrace: Drop the ftrace_profile_enabled
 checks in tracing hot path

On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 21:28 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:

> > Now for the reason I Cc'd Paul and Mathieu...
> > 
> > If we had a synchronize_sched() like function that would wait and return
> > when all preempted tasks have been scheduled again and went to either
> > userspace or called schedule directly, then we could actually do this.
> > 
> > After unregistering the function graph trace, you call this
> > "synchronize_tasks()" and it will guarantee that all currently preempted
> > tasks have either went to userspace or have called schedule() directly.
> > Then it would be safe to remove this check.
> 
> OK, so basically you need to know when you reach a quiescent state, but
> preemption is enabled and there is no RCU read lock taken around these
> code paths, am I correct ?
> 
> With tracepoints, life is easy because I disable preemption around the
> calls, so I can use synchronize_sched() to know when quiescent state is
> reached.
> 
> I recommend looking at kernel/kprobes.c:check_safety(). It uses
> thaw_processes() and synchronize_sched() for this purpose. Basically, it
> rely on the "refrigeration" points to detect such quiescent state. This
> trick should do the job for the function graph tracer too.
> 
> I'm adding Masami in CC. He is the one who implemented check_safety(),
> and I remember discussing it with him in the past.

Hmm, interesting. Maybe something like that might work. But what if
CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled but CONFIG_FREEZER is not?

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/