linux-kernel - [26/29] vmalloc: remove BUG_ON due to racy counting of VM_LAZY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:10:10 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Yongseok Koh <yongseok.koh@...sung.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: [26/29] vmalloc: remove BUG_ON due to racy counting of VM_LAZY_FREE

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Yongseok Koh <yongseok.koh@...sung.com>

commit 88f5004430babb836cfce886d5d54c82166f8ba4 upstream.

In free_unmap_area_noflush(), va->flags is marked as VM_LAZY_FREE first, and
then vmap_lazy_nr is increased atomically.

But, in __purge_vmap_area_lazy(), while traversing of vmap_are_list, nr
is counted by checking VM_LAZY_FREE is set to va->flags.  After counting
the variable nr, kernel reads vmap_lazy_nr atomically and checks a
BUG_ON condition whether nr is greater than vmap_lazy_nr to prevent
vmap_lazy_nr from being negative.

The problem is that, if interrupted right after marking VM_LAZY_FREE,
increment of vmap_lazy_nr can be delayed.  Consequently, BUG_ON
condition can be met because nr is counted more than vmap_lazy_nr.

It is highly probable when vmalloc/vfree are called frequently.  This
scenario have been verified by adding delay between marking VM_LAZY_FREE
and increasing vmap_lazy_nr in free_unmap_area_noflush().

Even the vmap_lazy_nr is for checking high watermark, it never be the
strict watermark.  Although the BUG_ON condition is to prevent
vmap_lazy_nr from being negative, vmap_lazy_nr is signed variable.  So,
it could go down to negative value temporarily.

Consequently, removing the BUG_ON condition is proper.

A possible BUG_ON message is like the below.

   kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:517!
   invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
   EIP: 0060:[<c04824a4>] EFLAGS: 00010297 CPU: 3
   EIP is at __purge_vmap_area_lazy+0x144/0x150
   EAX: ee8a8818 EBX: c08e77d4 ECX: e7c7ae40 EDX: c08e77ec
   ESI: 000081fe EDI: e7c7ae60 EBP: e7c7ae64 ESP: e7c7ae3c
   DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
   Call Trace:
   [<c0482ad9>] free_unmap_vmap_area_noflush+0x69/0x70
   [<c0482b02>] remove_vm_area+0x22/0x70
   [<c0482c15>] __vunmap+0x45/0xe0
   [<c04831ec>] vmalloc+0x2c/0x30
   Code: 8d 59 e0 eb 04 66 90 89 cb 89 d0 e8 87 fe ff ff 8b 43 20 89 da 8d 48 e0 8d 43 20 3b 04 24 75 e7 fe 05 a8 a5 a3 c0 e9 78 ff ff ff <0f> 0b eb fe 90 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 56 89 c6 b8 ac a5 a3 c0 31
   EIP: [<c04824a4>] __purge_vmap_area_lazy+0x144/0x150 SS:ESP 0068:e7c7ae3c

[ See also http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126335856228090&w=2 ]

Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yongseok.koh@...sung.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 mm/vmalloc.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -555,10 +555,8 @@ static void __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsig
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();

-	if (nr) {
-		BUG_ON(nr > atomic_read(&vmap_lazy_nr));
+	if (nr)
 		atomic_sub(nr, &vmap_lazy_nr);
-	}

 	if (nr || force_flush)
 		flush_tlb_kernel_range(*start, *end);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/