[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100123001414.GB14538@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:14:15 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <kernel@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Manuel Stahl <manuel.stahl@....fraunhofer.de>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
"Frysinger, Michael" <Michael.Frysinger@...log.com>,
"Getz, Robin" <Robin.Getz@...log.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
"Trisal, Kalhan" <kalhan.trisal@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Xing Z" <xing.z.zhang@...el.com>,
Ira Snyder <iws@...o.caltech.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Staging:IIO: New ABI
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:47:18PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:53:21PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > I am not aware of these. Could you direct me to the current api? Also note that these
> > aren't the actual alarms, merely a means of enabling the relevant event on the related
> > event character device.
>
> Hm, I thought we had an accelerator interface somewhere...
>
Nope. And I am also interested in this since I am sittign on a bunch of
accelerometers, magnetometers, etc drivers that are trying to plug into
input sysbsystem and quite unsure what to do with them.
It was OK whch HDAPS and friends when they were using input for
secondary, toyish purposes, but these new drivers trying to use input
devnts as primary API and I am unsure if it is the best solution.
Accelerometer might be used as an input device but not always an input
device.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists