| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20100122.173618.90816303.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:36:18 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: rostedt@...dmis.org Cc: vapier@...too.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com, brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: unify arch_syscall_addr() implementations From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:36:17 -0500 > [ Added Heiko Carstens and Paul Mundt to Cc ] > > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:43 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> also, does the arch_syscall_addr() even really need to be weak ? or can >> we assume that everyone is going to be sane and do it the same way ... >> >> Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt | 6 +++++- >> arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c | 10 ---------- >> arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c | 9 --------- >> arch/sparc/kernel/ftrace.c | 11 ----------- >> arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 10 ---------- >> include/linux/ftrace.h | 6 ++++++ >> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 6 +++++ > > Actually for this patch to be accepted, we need to get the acks from the > maintainers of s390, sh, and sparc since it touches their code. Doesn't > matter if it is just removing duplicate code. Still need their acks. Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists