[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100122.173618.90816303.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:36:18 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: vapier@...too.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com, brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: unify arch_syscall_addr() implementations
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:36:17 -0500
> [ Added Heiko Carstens and Paul Mundt to Cc ]
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:43 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> also, does the arch_syscall_addr() even really need to be weak ? or can
>> we assume that everyone is going to be sane and do it the same way ...
>>
>> Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt | 6 +++++-
>> arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c | 10 ----------
>> arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c | 9 ---------
>> arch/sparc/kernel/ftrace.c | 11 -----------
>> arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 10 ----------
>> include/linux/ftrace.h | 6 ++++++
>> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 6 +++++
>
> Actually for this patch to be accepted, we need to get the acks from the
> maintainers of s390, sh, and sparc since it touches their code. Doesn't
> matter if it is just removing duplicate code. Still need their acks.
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists