linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] net: NETDEV WATCHDOG should print something every time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:45:28 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: NETDEV WATCHDOG should print something every
 time

From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:43:33 -0800

> commit 5337407c changed NETDEV WATCHDOG messages into a message
> that will only print once per driver load.  This removed a significant amount
> of information from an admin who might be missing that his system was having
> NETDEV WATCHDOGs, esp since there is no other global counter available to
> count these events.

It's not once per driver load, it's once globally.

Once per driver load would be in fact what I would actually
consider more reasonable, so put the boolean state into
struct netdev, and test it to decide whether to do the
WARN_ON() print.

Doing a message every time is way overboard and is going to
spam some people's systems to the point where they can't
even diagnose the problem, so I'm not accepting a patch
which does that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/