[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B5CDB53.6030009@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:44:19 +0200
From: Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
CC: mchehab@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jirislaby@...il.com, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] media: dvb-usb/af9015, fix disconnection crashes
On 01/20/2010 07:19 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> When both remote controller and receiver intfs are handled by
> af9015, .probe do nothing for remote intf, but when .disconnect
> is called for both of them it touches intfdata every time. For
> remote it crashes obviously (as intfdata are unset).
>
> Altough there is test against data being NULL, it is not enough.
> It is because someone before us does not set intf drvdata to
> NULL. (In this case the hid layer.) But we cannot rely on intf
> being NULL anyway.
>
> Fix that by checking bInterfaceNumber in af9015_usb_device_exit
> and do actually nothing if it is not 0.
I was a little bit surprised when saw this error, why it haven't
detected earlier. When I initially added interface check for .probe it
was surely needed, it was creating two instances without that check in
that time. When I now test this patch with debugs enabled I don't see
.probe and .disconnect be called for this HID interface (interface 1) at
all and thus checks not needed. I have Fedora Kernel 2.6.31.12 running
with latest v4l-dvb. Is there now some kind of check added recently
which blocks .probe and disconnect from HID interface?
regards
Antti
--
http://palosaari.fi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists