linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.33-rc5 regression] NULL pointer dereference in vlan_skb_recv - probably introduced by commit 9793241fe92f7d9303fb221e43fc598eb065f267

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B5C74FB.6030308@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:27:39 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC:	Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.33-rc5 regression] NULL pointer dereference in	vlan_skb_recv
 - probably introduced by commit	9793241fe92f7d9303fb221e43fc598eb065f267

Le 24/01/2010 17:25, Américo Wang a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 04:25:49PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 January 2010 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Le 23/01/2010 22:31, Bruno Prémont a écrit :
>>>>> Above part of code did change between 2.6.32 and 2.6.33-rc5 with
>>>>> commit 9793241fe92f7d9303fb221e43fc598eb065f267 (vlan: Precise RX
>>>>> stats accounting)
>>>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9793241fe92f7d9303fb221e43fc598eb065f267
>>>>
>>>> Reverting just that commit gets the system running correctly.
>>>>
>>>> Bruno
>>>
>>> I have no idea how this patch can break vlan networking.
>>>
>>> Your disassembly and .config seems to show your machine is not SMP
>>
>> Exact
>>
>>> Maybe something is broken on UP and alloc_percpu() ?
>>
>> Apparently not, see below and previous mail
>>
>>> Could you add a debug in vlan_dev_init()
>>
>> In addition to previous mail, I'm also dumping the result of
>> vlan_dev_info(dev) shows that the returned pointer is not the same
>> during vlan_dev_init() and vlan_skb_recv() ...
>>
>> diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c b/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
>> index b788978..f370ce1 100644
>> --- a/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
>> +++ b/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
>> @@ -165,8 +165,11 @@ int vlan_skb_recv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>>
>>        rx_stats = per_cpu_ptr(vlan_dev_info(dev)->vlan_rx_stats,
>>                               smp_processor_id());
> 
> 
> I am thinking if vlan_dev_info(dev) here should be
> vlan_dev_info(skb->dev)...
> 
> 

Yes, I came to same conclusion :)

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/