[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001251142210.2906@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:45:26 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Carsten Emde <ce@...g.ch>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>,
Robin Gareus <robin@...eus.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Philippe Reynes <philippe.reynes@...smpp.fr>,
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU>,
Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@...t.ibm.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>, Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@...ell.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Mark Knecht <markknecht@...il.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: ARM fixes for 2.6.31.12-rt20
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have done build tests for ARCH=arm on 2.6.31.12-rt20 and to fix most
> platforms I needed to cherry pick three commits from post-2.6.31
> mainline:
>
> 9fd868f ([WATCHDOG] davinci: use clock framework for timer frequency)
> b9696ea (net: Fix IXP 2000 network driver building.)
> 0bfb34f (ARM: S3C2440: mini2440: Fix missing CONFIG_S3C_DEV_USB_HOST)
I have a hard time to see, why these patches fix most
platforms. AFAICT tell each one is fixing a single mach or board.
> (One of these fails to cleanly apply on top of 2.6.31.12-rt20 so I made
> them available at
>
> git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux-2.6.git rt/arm
>
> based on tip/rt/arm). Then there is a problem with highmem (only on
> ARM). A fix was discussed already earlier, but as there havn't been
> anyone volunteering to test it, Thomas didn't take it. As I don't have
> a machine needing highmem I cannot test either. So I just resend it as
> it changed slightly since the last post to keep it in the archives (or
> for the case Thomas wants to take it now).
No, I don't. Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists