linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [00/29] 2.6.32.6 stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100125171631.GB17421@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:16:31 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@...dus.org.tr>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [stable] [00/29] 2.6.32.6 stable review

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:40:35AM +0200, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote On 24-01-2010 18:29:
> > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> >> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:11:45 -0800 Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.32.6 release.
> >>> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> >>> this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
> >>> us know.  If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
> >>> to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> >>>
> >>> Responses should be made by Monday, January 24, 00:00:00 UTC.
> >>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >> 2.6.32.6 will still contain the regression described in (for example)
> >>
> >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15117 
> >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15005
> >>
> >> It's fixed with the below revert which has been in -mm (and only in
> >> -mm) for ten days.
> >>
> >> I don't what's going on - perhaps we're waiting for Thomas, and he's
> >> otherwise engaged.  There's a fix in the lkml thread "Re: [RFC PATCH
> >> 0/4] clockevents: fix clockevent_devices list corruption after cpu
> >> hotplug" to which Thomas replied
> >>
> >>     I just applied your patch, but kept the cpuweight check.  This
> >>     is the least intrusive solution for now.  The logic needs an
> >>     overhaul, but thats neither rc4 nor stable material"
> > 
> > Just sent the pull request for it. Sorry for the delay. The patch
> > needs to go into 32.6 as well.
> 
> tick-internal.h should be included for this to fix build failure. Already included
> in 2.6.33 with 8e1a928a2ed7e8.

Huh?  That says:
	clockevents: Add missing include to pacify sparse

and does not sound like a problem that needs to be fixed for "real"
users, right?

Or does .32.6 have a build problem somewhere?

confused,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/