[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1264447477.3696.30.camel@dyn9002018117.watson.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:24:37 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix 1 untangling ima mess, part 2 with counters
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 23:07 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:35:40PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > The "Untangling ima mess, part 2 with counters" patch messed
> > up the counters. Based on conversations with Al Viro, this patch
> > streamlines ima_path_check() by removing the counter maintaince.
> > The counters are now updated independently, from measuring the file,
> > in __dentry_open() and alloc_file() by calling ima_counts_get().
> > ima_path_check() is called from nfsd and do_filp_open().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
> > ---
> > fs/namei.c | 4 +-
> > include/linux/ima.h | 4 +-
> > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 234 ++++++++++++++-----------------------
>
> Um...
> a) where's the nfsd part?
> b) will that work if we open file with O_WRONLY?
Files opened O_WRONLY are not measured.
> nfsd side of things is non-trivial. Note that you have that thing called
> an awful lot; nfsd_permission() is called by fh_verify(). For which
> operations do you really want it to happen? Should it just migrate to
> nfsd_open()?
The IMA counters are updated in alloc_file() and __dentry_open().
__dentry_open() is called from a couple of places:
lookup_instantiate_filp(), nameidata_to_filp() and dentry_open. Of
these calls, files are only being measured in the nameidata_to_filp()
path. So yes, the current ima_path_check() needs to be moved to after
the dentry_open() in nfsd_open(), and also added after each of the other
dentry_open() and lookup_instantiate_filp() calls. Otherwise the
counters will be correct, but the files will not be measured.
Eric's proposed patches had two calls to ima_path_check(). Was sure
looking forward to not having to add ima_path_check() calls all over.
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists