[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100126084135.5A9D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:44:15 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
balajirrao@...il.com, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, linux390@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter batch values for stats counters
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:41:42 +1100
> Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org> wrote:
>
> > When CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING and CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT are enabled we can
> > call cpuacct_update_stats with values much larger than percpu_counter_batch.
> > This means the call to percpu_counter_add will always add to the global count
> > which is protected by a spinlock and we end up with a global spinlock in
> > the scheduler.
>
> When one looks at the end result:
We have about 32 jiffies batch both with or without CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING.
Then, The enduser can looks some jiffies after.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists