[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B5D5B68.6020806@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:50:48 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/10] tracing: Use the hashlist for graph function
Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> When we set a filter to start tracing from a given function in
> the function graph tracer, the filter is stored in a linear array.
>
> It doesn't scale very well, we even limited the number of such
> functions to 32.
>
> Now that we have a hashlist of functions, lets put a field inside
> each function node so that we can check if a function is one of
> these filters using the hashlist, not a linear array.
The linear array @ftrace_graph_funcs is still used in this patch.
we still limit the number of such functions to 32?
[...]
> #define FTRACE_GRAPH_MAX_FUNCS 32
> extern int ftrace_graph_count;
> extern unsigned long ftrace_graph_funcs[FTRACE_GRAPH_MAX_FUNCS];
> -
> -static inline int ftrace_graph_addr(unsigned long addr)
> -{
> - int i;
> -
> - if (!ftrace_graph_count)
> - return 1;
Here return 1.
[...]
> +static inline int ftrace_graph_addr(unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + struct func_node *rec;
> + struct func_hlist *hlist;
> +
> + if (!ftrace_graph_count)
> + return 0;
> +
But in this patch, return 0 here, the behave will be changed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists