linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.33-rc5] starting emacs makes lockdep warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2375c9f91001252201t552022ebvcd44b225eb7f9a95@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:01:12 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Tavis Ormandy <taviso@...gle.com>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [2.6.33-rc5] starting emacs makes lockdep warning

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:49 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:20 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
>> > <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > Current linus tree made following lockdep warning when starting emacs command.
>> > > Is this known issue?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > =========================================================
>> > > [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
>> > > 2.6.33-rc5 #77
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------
>> > > emacs/1609 just changed the state of lock:
>> > >  (&(&tty->ctrl_lock)->rlock){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff8127c648>] tty_fasync+0xe8/0x190
>> > > but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
>> > >  (&(&sighand->siglock)->rlock){-.....}
>> > >
>> > > and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > does reverting commit 703625118 help?
>>
>> Seems solved.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> I'm sorry.
> I forgot to cc related person at last mail.
>
> Greg, can you please consider revert commit 703625118?
>

I agree, it seems that patch is useless, since we already
do lock_kernel() before calling __f_setown()...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/