[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201001252336.55577.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:36:55 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>,
Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@...il.com>,
Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@...com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...nedhand.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] twl4030 threaded_irq support
On Monday 25 January 2010, David Brownell wrote:
> Did the threaded IRQ stuff ever get set up so that the top
> level IRQ thread didn't have to hand off to another thread
> each time? (That's how the current stuff works. One thread
> calling out to each handler.)
Yes: set_irq_nested_thread(). Looks like the toplevel IRQ
demux (in drivers/mfd/twl*irq*c) should use that, along with
the ONESHOT flag and (eventually) bus_lock stuff.
All the key parts that were missing a few years ago now seem
to be present. But, not yet in use here. :)
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists