[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001260456210.14707@p34.internal.lan>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:02:08 -0500 (EST)
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Hyperthreading on Core i7s: To use or not to use?
Hello,
Should the 'correct' kernel [CPU] configuration for a core i7 860/870..?
- Multi-core support
- Cores: 8
- SMT: Enabled/ON
>From CONFIG_SCHED_SMT:
. SMT scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision making .
. when dealing with Intel Pentium 4 chips with HyperThreading at a .
. cost of slightly increased overhead in some places. If unsure say .
. N here. .
Does this also 'help' and/or 'apply' as much when dealing with Core i7s?
--
Quick little benchmark (pbzip2 -9 linux kernel source), the benchmark is
really within the noise (8 on/off)
- Multicore(8)/HT(Off) = 73.72user 0.33system 0:09.50elapsed 779%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 458528maxresident
- Multicore(8)/HT(On) = 74.28user 0.40system 0:09.67elapsed 772%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 428304maxresident
- Multicore(4)/HT(On) = 68.76user 0.30system 0:17.44elapsed 396%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 213616maxresident)k
--
Has anyone done any in-depth benchmarking for the core i7s that have multiple
cores and HT disabled/enabled?
Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists