Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:13:44 +0100
From:	Stanislav Brabec <utx@...guin.cz>
To:	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, thommycheck@...il.com,
	dbaryshkov@...il.com, dtor@...l.ru, arminlitzel@....de,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dirk@...er-online.de, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	lenz@...wisc.edu, rpurdie@...ys.net,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Cyril Hrubis <metan@....cz>,
	zaurus-devel@...ts.linuxtogo.org, omegamoon@...il.com,
	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: gpio_keys and how PXA27x sets gpio_set_wake() (was Re: sharp 
 c-3000 aka spitz: fix warn_on introduced in 2.6.32-rc1)

Eric Miao wrota:

> I prefer 2) - the ugly and hardcoded setup in spitz_pm.c should really
> be removed. That's why the gpio_set_wake() and keypad_set_wake()
> are introduced.

I am unsure, whether gpio_keys driver is interested in the way, how wake
happens. I guess that is interested only in the fact, that wake
happened.

Handling platform specific edge/level wake setup would only complicate
the code. (In fact, even the PXA270 platform code does not exist yet -
arch/arm/mach-pxa/mfp-pxa2xx.c:__mfp_config_gpio() is not capable to
configure Power Manager Keyboard Wake-Up Enable Register (PKWR).)

I talked to Vojtěch Pavlík and he told that 1 is correct: Follow
include/linux/interrupt.h. Setting edge/level wake mode should be done
in the platform file. The driver could use just irq_set_wake() and don't
care about details. And irq_set_wake() should do something useful even
for PKWR capable GPIO.

> keypad_set_wake() is really specifically introduced for use by pxa27x_keypad
> and no generic GPIO stuffs. So it's really annoying a GPIO will use
> the PKWR as a wakeup GPIO, I'd recommend one still get this hard coded
> into the platform file, with combination of WAKEUP_ON_LEVEL_HIGH (which
> is specifically designed for keypad GPIOs) and keypad_set_wake().

Well, keypad_set_wake() seems to be possibly broken for GPIO 38. Imagine
a device, that has a small keypad, but GPIO 38 has a different purpose
that requires an edge triggered wakeup (PWER). I think that
keypad_set_wake() reprograms it to PKWR.

The problem affects gpio_keys: It is a driver implementing "one key per
gpio". It now handles On/Off and lid switches on Zaurus. Lid switches
are on "normal" GPIOs, On/Off switch is wired to PKWR capable GPIO.

> The spitz, however, is doing a good job on this though it's using a GPIO
> emulated matrix keypad, that there is a separate SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT,
> which triggers whenever there is any key press on this matrix (I don't
> know how that's designed in HW, but it seems to do that job), and
> which can be setup as a GPIO wakeup.

SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT happens if AC adapter is connected or key is pressed.
Surprisingly, the key press logic is part of NAND flash controller CPLD.
SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT==0 - it makes possible to wake Zaurus even from deep
sleep by any key press. It would be impossible only with PKWR.

I guess that this and implementation of keypad_set_wake() is a reason,
why most devices suspend and resume correctly even if the irq_set_wake()
refuses to configure wake and the warning is only visible symptom.


________________________________________________________________________
Stanislav Brabec
http://www.penguin.cz/~utx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists