[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1264503701.3067.69.camel@odin>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:01:41 +0000
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/01] regulator: support max8649
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 01:26 -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> From 2b5a73c336d2b5dc48c8cf1f2a804b6968659f78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...vell.com>
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:24:09 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] regulator: enable max8649 regulator driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...vell.com>
Can you confirm all the changes compared to the last version.
> +static int max8649_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> + struct max8649_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> + unsigned char data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = max8649_reg_read(info->i2c, info->vol_reg);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + data = (unsigned char)ret & MAX8649_VOL_MASK;
> + return (max8649_list_voltage(rdev, data));
Any reason why we have extra () here ?
Thanks
Liam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists