linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: bfin_sdh: set timeout based on actual card data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100125160733.d7930d71.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:07:33 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Cc:	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
	Cliff Cai <cliff.cai@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: bfin_sdh: set timeout based on actual card
 data

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:02:11 -0500
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org> wrote:

> From: Cliff Cai <cliff.cai@...log.com>
> 
> The hardcoded value doesn't really work for all cards.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cliff Cai <cliff.cai@...log.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>

Please don't write crappy changelogs.  

How am I to determine whether we want this fix in 2.6.33 and possibly
earlier?  How is anyone whose 2.6.32.x kernel "doesn't really work" to
determine whether this patch might fix it?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/