linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix 1 untangling ima mess, part 2 with counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:03:49 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix 1 untangling ima mess, part 2 with counters

OK, this stuff is in for-next, with the following changes:
	* nfsd call has been moved to nfsd_open()
	* patches reordered
	* masking irrelevant bits (i.e. leaving only MAY_{READ,WRITE,EXEC})
has been taken to ima_path_check(); all callers do it and it's safer that
way anyway.

Please, see if it's OK with you in this form; other calls of dentry_open()
are separate story, we'll have to see which ones should and which ones
should not get ima_path_check().  Do you have any other problems with that
one?  If not, it's going to migrate into for-linus and into the mainline;
this stuff is definitely 2.6.33 fodder.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/