[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B5E3E22.6030401@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:58:10 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/37] move round_up/down to kernel.h
On 01/25/2010 04:40 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> The problem is that arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h implements private
> rounding macros. The right way to fix that is to convert each x86
> "call site" over to using the standard macros from kernel.h, then
> finally remove the private definitions from
> arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h. Don't just copy them over to kernel.h
> and make things muddier than they already are!
>
> If during that conversion it is found that the standard macros for some
> reason don't suit the x86 usage sites then please propose
> enhancements/fixes to the existing kernel.h facilities.
>
They don't.
The kernel-global alignment macros assume that either the alignment
datum (divisor) is a constant, or that it is acceptable to take the hit
of a division. Unfortunately, we have real use cases where the
alignment (guaranteed to be a power of two) is variable, but we don't
want to take the hit of a full-blown division.
I suspect the global kernel tree has those, too, but it would seem to be
a dramatic change to change to change the existing facilities to assume
power of two alignment...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists