[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201001260721.29275.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:21:28 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: felipe.balbi@...ia.com
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@...il.com>,
Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/5] usb: otg: add notifier support
On Tuesday 26 January 2010, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >
> >Thing is, supplying current is a bit more involved. If the
> >board can't supply 300 mA, the USB configuration selection
> >mechanism has to know that, so it never selects peripheral
> >configurations which require that much current.
>
> but that's done already by the usb core, no ? It rules out configuration
> based on the hub->power_budget (can't remember if the field is that
> exact name).
Yes, it handles that ... but where does the power budget
come from? That's what I meant by "more involved".
As in, the host/supplying side of the power equation can't
be event driven like the peripheral/consuming side can.
And that's another reason I think it's best to fully solve
the common (peripheral, recharge-that-batter) case first.
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists