[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B5E401C.1050605@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:06:36 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, tytso@....edu, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
aelder@....com, hch@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
borislav.petkov@....com, ying.huang@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org,
neilb@...e.de, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to x86
On 01/25/2010 07:22 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> In arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c, per_cpu(exception_stacks, cpu) is
> replaced with &per_cpu(exception_stacks[0], cpu) which is equivalent
> except that it allows per_cpu() macro to correctly drop percpu
> designation during sparse pass.
>
Same comment as Frederic's about this... this kind of uglification
really is unacceptable and needs to be addressed.
Other than that, it looks good.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists