[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1264548028.31321.458.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:20:28 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] tracing: Prevent kernel oops with corrupted buffer
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 23:39 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:32:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pid < 0)) {
> > > + strcpy(comm, "<XXX>");
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (pid > PID_MAX_DEFAULT) {
> > > strcpy(comm, "<...>");
> > > return;
> >
> > But why is it WARN_ON_ONCE()? That will only fix the problem a single
> > time. On the second occurrence, it will oops again.
>
>
>
> The warning will be produced only once, but after that,
> the condition is still checked like a simple if:
>
> #define WARN_ON_ONCE(condition) ({ \
> static bool __warned; \
> int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
> \
> if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
> if (WARN_ON(!__warned)) \
> __warned = true; \
> unlikely(__ret_warn_once); \
> })
>
>
> And since this function can be called anytime we have a trace
> to print to the user, we don't want to encumber with thousands
> of warnings.
Exactly!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists