[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3636oh2rt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:20:22 -0700
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
utrace-devel@...hat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: add utrace tree
>>>>> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
Tom> * Support "displaced stepping" in the kernel; I think this would improve
Tom> performance when debugging in non-stop mode.
Linus> Don't we already do that at least on x86?
I don't know. If it does, and gdb does not yet use that, then that
would be worth changing.
Linus> Or maybe I'm not understanding what displaced stepping means to you.
In non-stop mode (where you can stop one thread but leave the others
running), gdb wants to have the breakpoints always inserted. So,
something must emulate the displaced instruction.
Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists