[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100126035906.GA23347@ldl.fc.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:59:06 -0700
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, justin.chen@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: infiniband limit of 32 cards per system?
* Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>:
>
> > My colleague points out the following enum in uverbs_main.c:
> >
> > enum {
> > IB_UVERBS_MAJOR = 231,
> > IB_UVERBS_BASE_MINOR = 192,
> > IB_UVERBS_MAX_DEVICES = 32
> > };
> >
> > Experimentally, we've determined that on a system where we
> > plugged in 40 IB cards, OFED only reports 32 cards are present.
>
> wow, 40 HCAs in one system !
HP sell some pretty big systems. :)
> > If that enum is indeed the limiting factor, would someone mind
> > explaining (or pointing me at TFM ;) why it's limited to 32
> > devices?
>
> That dates back to when device #s had 8 bits for major and 8 bits for
> minor. We got one major assigned for IB, and had to split up the 256
> minors that gave us among userspace verbs, management access, etc. And
> 32 seemed like a pretty reasonable limit for most uses.
Thanks for the explanation.
> Nowadays I guess we should look into expanding that to dynamic device
> numbers on overflow, assuming you do have a realistic situation where
> someone would want to use that many adapters per system.
Think of a large scale-up ia64 box, possibly running some
virtualization stack.
I'm guessing that it's not just a simple kernel fix though since
OFED has to change too, right?
/ac
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists