[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100126042644.GB31666@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:26:44 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] perf lock: New subcommand "perf lock", for
analyzing lock statistics
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:15:33PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> But, perf depends on debugfs.
> I don't know about production box well,
> does your production box turns on debugfs?
> It seems that debugfs is not a thing for production box...
Not true, it is enabled in many "enterprise" distros these days.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists